Parent topic

Suppression of Academic Freedom: the case of Nadia Abu El-Haj at Barnard College

To refer other people to this list of materials, use this URL:
              http://www.corkpsc.org/db.php?tid=2751

In addition to the material listed below, which has been explicitly marked as referring to this topic, there may be other material whose text contains the name of this topic. Select material containing the phrase: Suppression of Academic Freedom: the case of Nadia Abu El-Haj at Barnard College

Articles/Books

#72693 Barnard Alumnae Opposing Tenure for Anthropologist
by Gabrielle Birkner in New York Sun, 16 November 2006

#49942 Input or Intrusion?
by Scott Jaschik in Inside Higher Ed, 21 November 2006

#72690 Alexander Joffe Denies Conflict of Interest in Reviewing Abu El-Haj Book
by Richard Silverstein 30 August 2007

#71549 Middle East Tensions Flare Again in U.S. (Update)
by Scott Jaschik in Inside Higher Ed, 5 September 2007

#70557 Fracas Erupts Over Book on Mideast by a Barnard Professor Seeking Tenure
by Karen W. Arenson in The New York Times, 10 September 2007

#72696 Some Professional Observations on the Controversy about Nadia Abu El-Hajís First Book
by Alan F. Segal in Columbia Spectator, 21 September 2007

#72695 The Context of Lassner's Review of Facts on the Ground
by Joachim Martillo 26 September 2007

#71822 Land of the free?
by Richard Silverstein in Guardian: Comment is Free, 9 October 2007

#72694 Flinging Dirt In Archaeology Dispute
by Larry Cohler-Esses in The Jewish Week, 25 October 2007

#81525 The Petition: Israel, Palestine, and a tenure battle at Barnard
by Jane Kramer in New Yorker, April 2008




A disclaimer applies to this page. This page is not part of the official UCC website. This page is part of a research database of opinions on Palestine and related topics which is maintained by members of the UCC Palestine Solidarity Campaign, which comprises a group of students and staff in the university. The emphasis in this research project is on provenance -- we aim to provide as much information as possible on the background of the people whose opinions are in the database, so that readers can make up their own minds on the credibility that they wish to attach to these opinions.